In preparation for the next OpenStack Design Summit and Conference, I gave a look at the survey results of past edition. The events are a considerable investment for our team that is widely paid off by the good reviews we received from all participants. Looking into the answers it’s quite clear that the format and length were good and we should try to stick to it. We agreed that the attendance on Friday afternoon was not optimal and we’re thinking of ways to improve this aspect. I’m very happy to see that participants to the Design Summit felt welcomed, included and encouraged to speak all the time (see table below).
Speaking of areas of improvement, a key criteria for selecting the next venue will be high quality access to Internet or we’ll bring our own equipment (like Canonical does for the Ubuntu Design Summit). We’re also looking for more choice regarding hotel rates.
Both the unconference and lightning talks should be advertised better in order to improve attendance. Probably it’s because both were hard to find, being on a different floor. We should probably discuss how to improve them once we have fixed the venue.
On the Conference side we see a request to increase the presentation of case studies and have more sessions and choices (see table below). We’ll see how to balance this while keeping the format of the event.
Overall the responses were extremely positive and we’re very proud of what we’ve achieved so far. For the next Summit and Conference, we’re targeting the week of April 16 in New Orleans. We will post more information as soon as it is confirmed: keep watching this space for announcements.
| 14. Please rate how you felt the Design Summit sessions were managed: | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not at all | Rarely | Sometimes | All the time | N/A | Rating Average |
Response Count |
|
| Did you feel welcomed, included, and encouraged to speak for yourself? | 0.0% (0) | 2.3% (1) | 22.7% (10) | 72.7% (32) | 2.3% (1) | 3.72 | 44 |
| Were the sessions well-moderated, focused and productive? | 4.5% (2) | 4.5% (2) | 56.8% (25) | 34.1% (15) | 0.0% (0) | 3.20 | 44 |
| Did session leaders go out of their way to solicit your personal feedback? | 4.5% (2) | 9.1% (4) | 65.9% (29) | 18.2% (8) | 2.3% (1) | 3.00 | 44 |
| 15. How would you rate the sessions during the Conference (1-4): | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| poor (1) | fair (2) | good (3) | great (4) | N/A | Rating Average |
Response Count |
|
| Morning keynotes | 0.0% (0) | 8.9% (5) | 50.0% (28) | 32.1% (18) | 8.9% (5) | 3.25 | 56 |
| Technical sessions | 1.8% (1) | 7.1% (4) | 44.6% (25) | 41.1% (23) | 5.4% (3) | 3.32 | 56 |
| Panel sessions | 1.8% (1) | 21.4% (12) | 46.4% (26) | 21.4% (12) | 8.9% (5) | 2.96 | 56 |
| User stories | 0.0% (0) | 8.9% (5) | 44.6% (25) | 35.7% (20) | 10.7% (6) | 3.30 | 56 |
Read the full results of the survey.
This weekly newsletter is a way for the community to learn about all the various activities occurring on a weekly basis. If you would like to add content to a weekly update or have an idea about this newsletter, please leave a comment.
We had an informal 
