Boston
May 8-11, 2017

Event Details

Please note: All times listed below are in Central Time Zone


Event Correlation & Life Cycle Management: How Will They Coexist in the NFV World?

As Service Providers utilize OpenStack to move into the Network Function Virtualization (NFV) world, it is evident that the cloud can not operate in a vacuum. To make NFV a reality, there will be Management and Orchestration (MANO) capabilities added to the OpenStack environment. Then there will be further automation and integration with existing BSS/OSS systems. 

Not only will it be vital for the different environments to be integrated but it will be necessary for them to work together in order to understand the end to end picture and how events outside their area of responsibility can have impacts on the services within their purview.

Correlation of events across all environments will be key to successful life cycle management of VNFs. Lack of good correlation will result in inappropriate actions being taken by systems and people to address issues, leading to potentially longer service outages.


What can I expect to learn?

Monitoring & Correlation within the cloud (VIM)

1 - Has state of the infrastructure but no information on the services that utilize the infrastructure.

2 - Can recover a VNF but what about its configuration?

3 - What happens when there are issues outside the cloud that impact the service the VNF provides?

 

Monitoring & Correlation within MANO (NFVO/VNFM)

1- Has state of the services but does it truly know the infrastructure to correlate infrastructure events into service outages and recovery.

2 - Can recover and configure a VNF but can it really determine when the VNF is having issues versus underlay network issue? 

3 - Does it understand how the customer connects to the cloud and can it isolate issues to prevent taking inappropriate actions?

 

Monitoring & Correlation in Legacy Assurance Systems (NOCs)

1 - Integration of the environments

2 - Will these systems understand the virtual world enough to determine when a customers service has been disrupted?

3 - Will these systems be able to have a complete end to end view of the customer’s service?

 

Life Cycle Management - will it be clear who own what components or will multiple orchestrators and systems attempt to “Heal” the same components?

Wednesday, May 10, 1:50pm-2:30pm (5:50pm - 6:30pm UTC)
Difficulty Level: Intermediate
Advisory Services, Senior Consultant
Mr. Evenchick has been in the Telecommunications and Information Technology fields for 20+ years holding various technical positions. Mr. Evenchick has focused on workflow architecture, system integration and automation to gain efficiencies for clients. Mr. Evenchick has had extenive experience with Network Management (fault and performance), Configuration Management,... FULL PROFILE
Senior Software Engineer
Mr. Sorsby has been in the Telecommunications and Information Technology fields for 20+ years. He worked for 10 years at Earthlink with a focus on network, server and service fault and performance management.  He also spent 10 years with Alcatel-Lucent integrating service assurance solutions in environments spanning service providers, telcos and public utilities.  His focus in his... FULL PROFILE
Sr Strategic Architect
With more than 30 years experience in the information, networking and systems engineering fields, Bill Coward is the Strategic Architect responsible for technical leadership and direction of the Cloud Enablement efforts at Cox Communications. Bill has designed, supported and deployed many complex solutions during his 11 years at Cox including Backbone Video Encryption, Multicast VPN,... FULL PROFILE